As aviation regulations evolve, the conversation around using airplane mode during flights is becoming increasingly relevant. While some countries are relaxing rules, experts strongly advise travelers to follow crew instructions regarding electronic devices. Understanding the reasoning behind these guidelines can illuminate their importance and potential consequences.

The Rationale Behind Airplane Mode

For many frequent fliers, the requirement to switch devices to airplane mode can seem arbitrary. However, the underlying reasons are rooted in safety and operational integrity. Aviation professionals emphasize that even if the risks may appear minimal, the etiquette of following the rule is crucial.

Gary Coxe, a seasoned pilot with over 7,000 flight hours, believes that neglecting to enable airplane mode likely won’t lead to catastrophic outcomes. Similarly, an anonymous airline mechanic from Washington shares this sentiment, suggesting that the consequences are generally not dire. Yet, both experts acknowledge that it’s courteous to comply with this rule, primarily to prevent any potential disruptions.

Potential Interference with Cockpit Communications

One notable concern involves the interference of passenger devices with pilots' headsets. PerchPoint, a U.S. Army veteran pilot and popular TikTok influencer, explains that if multiple passengers leave their phones on, the resulting radio waves could disrupt the clarity of communications between the cockpit and the control tower. This interference is particularly problematic during critical phases of flight, such as take-off and landing, when clear communication is essential for safety.

According to PerchPoint, while pilots may still receive instructions, the audio clarity could diminish, creating distracting background noise akin to a buzzing mosquito. Such distractions can hinder pilots' ability to make informed decisions during crucial moments.

FAA Regulations and Historical Context

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has not confirmed any incidents linking mobile phone use during flight to accidents. Nonetheless, they assert that all personal electronic devices must not interfere with the aircraft’s safety or communications systems. This regulatory stance is influenced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which banned in-flight cell phone use in 1991 due to concerns that signals could disrupt critical aircraft instruments.

In 2013, the FCC revisited this ban, recognizing advances in technology that could facilitate safe in-flight phone use if devices are in airplane mode. Research during this period indicated that interference from cell phones was exceedingly rare, with only 29 suspected incidents reported from 2003 to 2009.

Evolving International Regulations

In contrast to U.S. regulations, the U.K. and European Union have embraced in-flight connectivity, allowing passengers to use their phones without switching to airplane mode. The European Commission has mandated the installation of "picocells" on aircraft, which function as portable cell towers, enabling safe connectivity without interference. This technology operates on lower frequency bands, distinct from U.S. 5G networks, which operate at higher frequencies that pose a potential risk to aircraft systems.

As of June 2023, European airlines are required to equip their fleets with this technology, reflecting a significant shift towards enhanced connectivity in the air. However, U.S. travelers must still abide by the FAA's longstanding regulations, which have not been updated since 2017. A public affairs specialist for the FAA emphasizes the necessity of adhering to all crew instructions, regardless of the reasons provided.

Consequences of Noncompliance

While there are no documented cases of passengers facing jail time for refusing to switch to airplane mode, there have been instances of fines and removal from flights. For example, in 2016, a passenger was fined over $600 for ignoring crew instructions on a Flybe flight, and in 2018, a disagreement over airplane mode led to a passenger being ejected from a flight in Indiana.

The Benefits of Complying with Airplane Mode

Ultimately, while the debate surrounding airplane mode continues, adhering to crew instructions remains the safest and most responsible choice. Enabling airplane mode not only conserves battery life by preventing constant attempts to connect to cell towers but also enhances the overall in-flight experience. It allows passengers to disconnect, relax, and enjoy their journey without the pressures of connectivity.

So the next time you board a plane, remember to comply with the instructions given by the crew. Embrace the opportunity to take a break from your devices, and appreciate the unique experience of flying. Sit back, relax, and enjoy the view from above—after all, it’s part of the adventure

✈️ Helpful Tips for Using Your Phone on a Plane

• Always follow crew instructions. Even if other countries allow more liberal phone use, U.S. regulations still require airplane mode unless otherwise specified.

• Use airplane mode to save battery. Your phone stops searching for a signal, significantly extending battery life during long flights.

• Enable Wi-Fi and Bluetooth separately. Once in airplane mode, you can still turn Wi-Fi and Bluetooth back on manually to use in-flight internet and connect to wireless headphones.

• Download entertainment before takeoff. Streaming services may not be available or may be slow in-flight, so pre-download movies, podcasts, or music.

• Use the flight’s Wi-Fi legally. Many airlines offer paid or free Wi-Fi that complies with safety standards, including messaging options like iMessage or WhatsApp.

• Charge before you board. Not all aircraft have charging ports, and airplane mode helps preserve battery during flights without power access.

• Be respectful with calls (if allowed). On flights where calls are permitted, use earphones and speak quietly to avoid disturbing fellow passengers.

• Stay updated on policies. If you're flying internationally, check with your airline about their specific in-flight mobile device rules—they may vary from country to country.

By keeping these tips in mind, you can stay connected when necessary, avoid unnecessary fines or conflict, and travel with peace of mind.

A Ryanair Boeing 737 operating flight FR6080 from London Stansted to Kalamata International Airport collided with a perimeter barrier while taxiing after landing on June 18, 2025, causing significant damage to the right wingtip. The incident followed a flight marked by severe turbulence during descent, with passengers reporting intense shaking and no prior seatbelt warning.

 The captain had cautioned about a rough landing due to adverse weather conditions. Despite the turbulence, the aircraft landed safely on the runway.

During taxiing to the parking stand, the aircraft deviated and struck a red-and-white perimeter fence, resulting in a loud bang heard by passengers and visible tearing of the wingtip metal, as confirmed by photographs shared online. No injuries were reported among the 179 passengers and six crew members.

Passengers remained onboard under crew instructions while airport emergency services assessed the damage and potential fire risk. Some passengers expressed concern about the delay in evacuation given the visible wing damage and proximity to fuel systems, but Ryanair stated that the aircraft completed taxiing safely before passengers disembarked normally.

The airline confirmed that the aircraft underwent a full maintenance inspection and necessary repairs before returning to service.

The Boeing 737 remained on the ground for approximately five and a half hours during inspection and repair. Afterward, it resumed operations, flying to Milan-Bergamo Airport and continuing its scheduled rotations, including a return flight to London Stansted. Ryanair reported no disruption to its flight schedule and has not announced any formal investigation into the incident.

The event has prompted discussions about ground movement safety protocols and turbulence management, especially regarding communication with passengers during severe weather and post-landing procedures. Passengers highlighted the lack of seatbelt alerts before turbulence and questioned the safety decisions made after the collision.

Aviation experts and authorities are monitoring the situation, though no official inquiry has been launched as of this writing.

Ryanair operates a large fleet of Boeing 737 aircraft across Europe and emphasized that safety remains a top priority. The airline reassured that all required inspections and maintenance were completed before the aircraft returned to active service.

The United States has quietly withdrawn nearly 40 military aircraft from Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, its largest airbase in the Middle East, amid escalating fears of potential Iranian strikes as tensions rise between Iran and Israel.

Satellite images from Planet Labs PBC, analyzed by multiple news agencies, show that between June 5 and June 19, the previously crowded tarmac—home to C-130 Hercules transport planes and advanced reconnaissance jets—was largely emptied, with only three aircraft visible by June 19.

The move is widely seen as a preemptive measure to protect US military assets from possible Iranian attacks, especially as Washington weighs whether to support Israel’s ongoing military operations against Iran.

US officials, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, confirmed that the aircraft were removed due to their vulnerability to potential Iranian missile or drone strikes, given the base’s proximity to Iran. In addition to the aircraft, some US naval vessels have also been repositioned from the region as a precaution.

The US Embassy in Qatar has responded by restricting access to the base, citing “an abundance of caution and in light of ongoing regional hostilities,” and has urged personnel to exercise increased vigilance.

Meanwhile, public flight tracking data shows that at least 27 US military refueling aircraft, such as the KC-46A Pegasus and KC-135 Stratotanker, were redeployed from the US to Europe between June 15 and 18, with most remaining in Europe as of June 19—an indication that the US could be preparing for extended operations or repositioning assets for greater security.

Al Udeid Air Base, located near Doha and established in 1996, houses around 10,000 US troops and serves as the forward headquarters for US Central Command (CENTCOM). It has played a pivotal role in US operations across Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan.

The current redeployment comes as US forces across the Middle East are placed on high alert, with military families offered voluntary evacuation from bases in the region due to the heightened risk of Iranian retaliation.

President Donald Trump has not yet decided whether the US will join Israel’s campaign against Iran’s military and nuclear infrastructure, but a decision is expected within the next two weeks, according to White House officials. Iran has warned that any US involvement in the conflict would trigger direct attacks on American bases in the region

Oman has intensified its efforts to repatriate citizens from northern regions of Iran, as part of a wider response to ongoing regional tensions. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in coordination with the Omani Embassy in Tehran, has launched a multi-phase evacuation plan utilizing key land border crossings with Turkey, Iraq, and Turkmenistan.

These routes include the Razi-Kapiköy crossing into Turkey, the Shalamcheh-Basra crossing into Iraq, and the Bagiran-Ashgabat route for those near Mashhad heading into Turkmenistan.

In the latest phase of this operation, 123 Omani nationals were safely returned home via Bandar Abbas following careful coordination with relevant authorities. Ten coaches were dispatched to transport citizens from northern Iran to the Turkish border, while three coaches were sent towards the Shalamcheh crossing with Iraq, reflecting the Ministry’s commitment to secure and orderly travel arrangements.

The Ministry has established assembly points in Shiraz and Bandar Abbas and urges all citizens in Iran to remain in their current locations, cooperate with embassy field teams, and await instructions regarding departure schedules. Omani authorities have expressed gratitude to Iranian officials for their cooperation and reaffirmed their round-the-clock efforts to ensure the safety of all citizens.

These repatriation measures come amid heightened regional instability, with Oman also intensifying diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions, particularly following Israeli military actions against Iran. His Majesty and senior officials have emphasized the importance of dialogue, international law, and peaceful negotiation as the only viable path to lasting regional security and stability.
To date, more than 300 Omani citizens have been repatriated from Iran under this coordinated operation, and the Ministry continues to call on all nationals in affected areas to maintain contact with Omani representatives and register their details for support.

Flight tracking data from Flightradar24 and FlightAware reveals a sharp increase in flight cancellations to Dubai International Airport (DXB), affecting routes far beyond the immediate Middle East conflict zone. The surge follows widespread airspace closures over Iran, Iraq, Jordan, and Israel due to the Iran–Israel crisis that began on June 13, causing significant ripple effects across global aviation networks.

On routes from Pakistan and India, cancellation rates have jumped fourfold from a pre-crisis average of 5% to about 20%. Flights from Karachi, Lahore, and Multan have been particularly affected, with many services scrubbed around June 7 as the crisis escalated. European connections, while less severely impacted, are also under strain.

 Routes from Istanbul and other major hubs now face cancellation rates of 5–10%, up from the usual 1–3%, indicating a broadening disruption across international air traffic networks.

The closure of critical air corridors has left airlines with difficult operational choices: reroute flights via much longer paths, adding hours to travel time, or cancel services entirely to prevent cascading disruptions to aircraft rotations and crew schedules. These detours not only increase fuel costs and logistical complexity but also reduce overall fleet flexibility, leading to more cancellations even on routes not directly affected by the closed airspaces.

The operational impact has been substantial. As of June 16, more than 700 flights across the region had been cancelled, including services from Dubai International (DXB), Dubai World Central (DWC), Abu Dhabi’s Zayed International, and Sharjah International Airport. On June 16 alone, 6% of flights from DXB were cancelled and 34% delayed. Low-cost carriers like Flydubai and Air Arabia have seen cancellation rates as high as 13% and 12%, respectively, with delays affecting up to 38% of flights on some days.

Major UAE airlines Emirates, Etihad, Flydubai, Wizz Air, and Air Arabia have all extended suspensions and cancellations to destinations including Iran, Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, and Jordan, with some routes suspended until June 30. Emirates has also confirmed that passengers with connecting flights to these destinations will not be accepted for travel until further notice. Flydubai and Air Arabia have similarly adjusted their timelines, with ongoing suspensions and gradual resumptions for certain routes.

The UAE authorities have responded by launching an emergency airport response plan to ensure passenger safety and manage the increased disruption. Travelers are being advised to check flight status regularly, allow extra time for airport procedures, and be flexible with travel plans. Dubai Airports has issued advisories about ongoing delays and cancellations, emphasizing efforts to minimize inconvenience.

Beyond the Middle East, secondary routes to destinations such as Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Uzbekistan have also been affected, with flights either cancelled or delayed due to rerouting around closed airspaces. The situation remains fluid, and airlines continue to prioritize long-haul and high-demand routes, leaving some secondary services more vulnerable to disruption.

Passengers are urged to stay updated through official airline channels and to expect continued delays and cancellations as the crisis evolves.

A Saudia Airlines flight carrying 442 Hajj pilgrims was diverted in Indonesian airspace on Tuesday after a bomb threat was received via email. The aircraft, a Boeing 777 operating as Flight SV 5276 from Jeddah to Jakarta, was carrying 207 men and 235 women on their pilgrimage journey when the threat was reported at around 7:30 am local time. The message, sent by an unidentified individual, threatened to "blow up" the plane while it was en route to Jakarta International Airport.

In response to the security alert, the pilot diverted the flight to Kualanamu International Airport in Medan, North Sumatra, landing safely just after 10:00 am. Upon arrival, all passengers and crew were immediately evacuated without incident. Indonesian authorities, including a joint team from the police bomb disposal unit, military, and airport security, thoroughly searched the aircraft, baggage, and cargo compartments. The sweep concluded at 6:47 pm and found no evidence of explosives or other threats.

During the inspection, the aircraft was moved to an isolated area of the airport to ensure normal operations continued at Kualanamu. Passengers and crew were accommodated in nearby hotels while the investigation proceeded. After the aircraft was cleared and declared safe, it was allowed to continue its journey to Jakarta with its original passengers and crew on Wednesday morning.

Saudia Airlines emphasized that the safety and well-being of its guests and crew remain the highest priority. The airline provided full care and support to all onboard and arranged onward travel. Indonesian authorities praised the swift and coordinated response of the airline, airport security, and local government for maintaining calm and ensuring passenger safety throughout the incident.

The Directorate General of Indonesian Civil Aviation confirmed that the bomb threat was a hoax, and no one was harmed during the incident. The quick action prevented any disruption to other airport activities, and the situation was resolved without further incident.